fixed typos
This commit is contained in:
parent
bb3048b2a0
commit
cc14d1afdf
|
|
@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ the results by~\citep{Jain2020.11.01.363887}. Minimap2 v2.22 is as good as
|
|||
Winnowmap2 now. Note that we were setting the Sniffles mapping quality
|
||||
threshold to 10 in consistent with the benchmarks above. If we used the
|
||||
default threshold 20, v2.22 would miss additional five SVs (accounting for
|
||||
0.5\% of simulated SVs). For four out of these missing five SVs, minimap2 v2.22
|
||||
0.5\% of simulated SVs). For four out of these five missing SVs, minimap2 v2.22
|
||||
mapped more variant reads than Winnowmap2. Sniffles did not call these SVs
|
||||
because minimap2 tended to give them conservative mapping quality. It is worth
|
||||
noting that the simulation here only considers a simple scenario in evolution.
|
||||
|
|
@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ so did not report the numbers.
|
|||
|
||||
Minimap2 spends most computing time on base alignment. As recent improvements
|
||||
in v2.22 incur little additional computing and do not change the base alignment
|
||||
algorithm, the new version has similar performance to older verions. It is
|
||||
algorithm, the new version has similar performance to older versions. It is
|
||||
consistently faster than Winnowmap2 by several times. Sometimes simple
|
||||
heuristics can be as effective as more sophisticated yet slower solutions.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue