Revision v2

This commit is contained in:
Heng Li 2018-03-16 11:18:06 -04:00
parent d135feb1a5
commit b81d45510e
1 changed files with 5 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -652,9 +652,9 @@ across the whole genome and have been \emph{de novo} assembled with SMRT reads
to high quality. This allowed us to construct an independent truth variant
dataset~\citep{Li223297} for
ERR1341796. In this evaluation, minimap2 has higher SNP false negative rate
(FNR; 2.5\% of minimap2 vs 2.2\% of BWA-MEM), but fewer false positive SNPs per
million bases (FPPM; 3.0 vs 3.9), lower 2--50bp INDEL FNR (7.3\% vs 7.5\%) and
similar INDEL FPPM (both 1.0). Minimap2 is broadly similar to BWA-MEM in the
(FNR; 2.6\% of minimap2 vs 2.3\% of BWA-MEM), but fewer false positive SNPs per
million bases (FPPM; 7.0 vs 8.8), similar INDEL FNR (11.2\% vs 11.3\%) and
similar INDEL FPPM (6.4 vs 6.5). Minimap2 is broadly comparable to BWA-MEM in the
context of small variant calling.
\subsection{Aligning long-read assemblies}
@ -717,6 +717,8 @@ Schatz, P. Rescheneder and F. Sedlazeck for pointing out the limitation of
BWA-MEM. We are also grateful to minimap2 users who have greatly helped to
suggest features and to fix various issues.
\paragraph{Funding\textcolon} NHGRI 1R01HG010040-01
\bibliography{minimap2}
\end{document}