finished the first draft
This commit is contained in:
parent
e37f5ffe39
commit
8e81145817
|
|
@ -183,7 +183,9 @@ truth to evaluate other mappers (winno-cmp). Out of 1,378,092 reads with mapQ10
|
||||||
alignments by Winnowmap2, minimap2 v2.22 could map all of them. 118 reads, less
|
alignments by Winnowmap2, minimap2 v2.22 could map all of them. 118 reads, less
|
||||||
than 0.01\% of all reads, were mapped differently by v2.22. 51 of them have
|
than 0.01\% of all reads, were mapped differently by v2.22. 51 of them have
|
||||||
multiple identical best alignments. We believe these are more likely to be
|
multiple identical best alignments. We believe these are more likely to be
|
||||||
Winnowmap2 errors.
|
Winnowmap2 errors. Most of the remaining 67 (=118-51) reads have multiple
|
||||||
|
highly similar but not identical alignments. We are not sure what are real
|
||||||
|
mapping errors.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The two benchmarks above only evaluate read mappings without variations.
|
The two benchmarks above only evaluate read mappings without variations.
|
||||||
To measure the mapping accuracy in the presence of SVs (sim-sv), we reproduced
|
To measure the mapping accuracy in the presence of SVs (sim-sv), we reproduced
|
||||||
|
|
@ -207,10 +209,11 @@ better, too. However, we could not get lra to work well with dipcall, so did
|
||||||
not report the numbers.
|
not report the numbers.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Minimap2 spends most computing time on base alignment. As recent improvements
|
Minimap2 spends most computing time on base alignment. As recent improvements
|
||||||
in v2.22 do not change the base alignment algorithm, the new version has similar
|
in v2.22 incur little additional computing and do not change the base alignment
|
||||||
performance to older verions. Minimap2 is consistently faster than Winnowmap2
|
algorithm, the new version has similar performance to older verions. It is
|
||||||
by several times.
|
consistently faster than Winnowmap2 by several times. Our simple heuristics can
|
||||||
|
be as effective as more complex solutions on real data and may help the
|
||||||
|
development of future sequence aligners.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section*{Acknowledgements}
|
\section*{Acknowledgements}
|
||||||
We thank Arang Rhie and Chirag Jain for providing motivating examples where
|
We thank Arang Rhie and Chirag Jain for providing motivating examples where
|
||||||
|
|
@ -218,8 +221,6 @@ older minimap2 underperforms.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\paragraph{Funding\textcolon} This work is funded by NHGRI grant R01HG010040.
|
\paragraph{Funding\textcolon} This work is funded by NHGRI grant R01HG010040.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
~\\*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\bibliography{minimap2}
|
\bibliography{minimap2}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\end{document}
|
\end{document}
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue