This website requires JavaScript.
Explore
Help
Sign In
zzh
/
gatk-3.8
Watch
1
Star
0
Fork
You've already forked gatk-3.8
0
Code
Issues
Pull Requests
Packages
Projects
Releases
Wiki
Activity
d20a25d681
gatk-3.8
/
public
/
java
/
test
History
Eric Banks
d20a25d681
A much better way of choosing the alternate allele(s) to genotype in the SNP model of UG: instead of looking at the sum of base qualities (which can and did lead to us over-genotyping esp. when allowing multiple alternate alleles), we look at the likelihoods themselves (free since we are already calculating likelihoods for all 10 genotypes). Now, even if the base quals exceed some arbitrary threshold, we only bother genotyping an alternate allele when there's a sample for which it is more likely than ref/ref (I can generate weird edge cases where this falls apart, but none that model truly variable sites that we actually want to call). This leads to a huge efficiency improvement esp. for exomes (and esp. for many samples) where we almost always were trying to genotype all 3 alternate alleles. Integration tests change only because ref calls have slight QUAL differences (because the best alt allele is still chosen arbitrarily, but differently).
2011-12-27 16:50:38 -05:00
..
net
/sf
Removed annoying FastaSequenceIndexBuilderProgressListener infrastructure that was just a boolean switch on whether to print progress or not.
2011-07-27 22:06:23 -04:00
org/broadinstitute
/sting
A much better way of choosing the alternate allele(s) to genotype in the SNP model of UG: instead of looking at the sum of base qualities (which can and did lead to us over-genotyping esp. when allowing multiple alternate alleles), we look at the likelihoods themselves (free since we are already calculating likelihoods for all 10 genotypes). Now, even if the base quals exceed some arbitrary threshold, we only bother genotyping an alternate allele when there's a sample for which it is more likely than ref/ref (I can generate weird edge cases where this falls apart, but none that model truly variable sites that we actually want to call). This leads to a huge efficiency improvement esp. for exomes (and esp. for many samples) where we almost always were trying to genotype all 3 alternate alleles. Integration tests change only because ref calls have slight QUAL differences (because the best alt allele is still chosen arbitrarily, but differently).
2011-12-27 16:50:38 -05:00