gatk-3.8/public/java/test
Eric Banks 202405b1a1 Updating the FunctionalClass stratification in VariantEval to handle the snpEff annotations; this change really needs to be in before the release so that the pipeline can output semi-meaningful plots. This commit maintains backwards compatibility with the crappy Genomic Annotator output. However, I did clean up the code a bit so that we now use an Enum instead of hard-coded values (so it's now much easier to change things if we choose to do so in the future). I do not see this as the final commit on this topic - I think we need to make some changes to the snpEff annotator to preferentially choose certain annotations within effect classes; Mark, let's chat about this for a bit when you get back next week. Also, for the record, I should be blamed for David's temporary commit the other day because I gave him the green light (since when do you care about backwards compatibility anyways?). In any case, at least now we have something that works for both the old and new annotations. 2011-09-15 13:52:31 -04:00
..
net/sf Removed annoying FastaSequenceIndexBuilderProgressListener infrastructure that was just a boolean switch on whether to print progress or not. 2011-07-27 22:06:23 -04:00
org/broadinstitute/sting Updating the FunctionalClass stratification in VariantEval to handle the snpEff annotations; this change really needs to be in before the release so that the pipeline can output semi-meaningful plots. This commit maintains backwards compatibility with the crappy Genomic Annotator output. However, I did clean up the code a bit so that we now use an Enum instead of hard-coded values (so it's now much easier to change things if we choose to do so in the future). I do not see this as the final commit on this topic - I think we need to make some changes to the snpEff annotator to preferentially choose certain annotations within effect classes; Mark, let's chat about this for a bit when you get back next week. Also, for the record, I should be blamed for David's temporary commit the other day because I gave him the green light (since when do you care about backwards compatibility anyways?). In any case, at least now we have something that works for both the old and new annotations. 2011-09-15 13:52:31 -04:00