Eric reported this bug due to the reduced reads failing with an index out of bounds on what we thought was a deletion, but turned out to be a read starting with insertion.
* Refactored PileupElement to distinguish clearly between deletions and read starting with insertion
* Modified ExtendedEventPileup to correctly distinguish elements with deletion when creating new pileups
* Refactored most of the lazyLoadNextAlignment() function of the LocusIteratorByState for clarity and to create clear separation between what is a pileup with a deletion and what's not one. Got rid of many useless if statements.
* Changed the way LocusIteratorByState creates extended event pileups to differentiate between insertions in the beginning of the read and deletions.
* Every deletion now has an offset (start of the event)
* Fixed bug when LocusITeratorByState found a read starting with insertion that happened to be a reduced read.
* Separated the definitions of deletion/insertion (in the beginning of the read) in all UG annotations (and the annotator engine).
* Pileup depth of coverage for a deleted base will now return the average coverage around the deletion.
* Indel ReadPositionRankSum test now uses the deletion true offset from the read, changed all appropriate md5's
* The extra pileup elements now properly read by the Indel mode of the UG made any subsequent call have a different random number and therefore all RankSum tests have slightly different values (in the 10^-3 range). Updated all appropriate md5s after extremely careful inspection -- Thanks Ryan!
phew!
-- Missing BAMs were appearing as StingExceptions
-- Missing VCFs were showing up as CommandLineErrors, but it's clearer for them to be CouldNotReadInputFile exceptions
-- Added integration tests to ensure missing BAMs, VCFs, and -L files are properly thrown as CouldNotReadInputFile exceptions
-- Added path to standard b37 BAM to BaseTest
-- Cleaned up code in SAMDataSource, removing my parallel loading code as this just didn't prove to be useful.
This is somewhat of an arbitrary decision, and is negotiable. I could see treating
GT:PL ./.:.
differently from
GT:PL .:0,3,6
but am not sure the worth of doing so.
* using the filter() instead of map() makes for a cleaner walker.
* renaming the unit tests to make more sense with the other unit and integration tests
* if the adaptor boundary is more than MAXIMUM_ADAPTOR_SIZE bases away from the read, then let's not clip anything and consider the fragment to be undetermined for this read pair.
* updated md5's accordingly
-- Call sets with indels > 50 bp in length are tagged as CNVs in the tag (following the 1000 Genomes convention) and were unconditionally checking whether the CNV is already known, by looking at the known cnvs file, which is optional. Fixed. Has the annoying side effect that indels > 50bp in size are not counted as indels, and so are substrated from both the novel and known counts for indels. C'est la vie
-- Added integration test to check for this case, using Mauricio's most recent VCF file for NA12878 which has many large indels. Using this more recent and representative file probably a good idea for more future tests in VE and other tools. File is NA12878.HiSeq.WGS.b37_decoy.indel.recalibrated.vcf in Validation_Data
Some tests in this class were intermittently not being executed due
to being randomly scheduled before tests whose results they depend on.
Now the serial dependencies are enforced to avoid problematic orderings.
Mauricio Carneiro
Eric Banks
Mark DePristo
Christopher Hartl
Ryan Poplin
Guillermo del Angel
David Roazen
Laurent Francioli