Ns are treated as wildcards in the PairHMM so creating haplotypes with Ns gives them artificial advantages over other ones.
This was the cause of at least one FN where there were Ns at a SNP position.
Problem:
The sequence graphs can get very complex and it's not enough just to test that any given read has non-unique kmers.
Reads with variants can have kmers that match unique regions of the reference, and this causes cycles in the final
sequence graph. Ultimately the problem is that kmers of 10/25 may not be large enough for these complex regions.
Solution:
We continue to try kmers of 10/25 but detect whether cycles exist; if so, we do not use them. If (and only if) we
can't get usable graphs from the 10/25 kmers, then we start iterating over larger kmers until we either can generate
a graph without cycles or attempt too many iterations.
-- Reuse infrastructure for RODs for reads to implement general IntervalReferenceOrderedView so that both TraverseReads and TraverseActiveRegions can use the same underlying infrastructure
-- TraverseActiveRegions now provides a meaningful RefMetaDataTracker to ActiveRegionWalker.map
-- Cleanup misc. code as it came up
-- Resolves GSA-808: Write general utility code to do rsID allele matching, hook up to UG and HC
-- Variants will be considered matching if they have the same reference allele and at least 1 common alternative allele. This matching algorithm determines how rsID are added back into the VariantContext we want to annotate, and as well determining the overlap FLAG attribute field.
-- Updated VariantAnnotator and VariantsToVCF to use this class, removing its old stale implementation
-- Added unit tests for this VariantOverlapAnnotator class
-- Removed GATKVCFUtils.rsIDOfFirstRealVariant as this is now better to use VariantOverlapAnnotator
-- Now requires strict allele matching, without any option to just use site annotation.
The previous behavior is to process reads with N CIGAR operators as they are despite that many of the tools do not actually support such operator and results become unpredictible.
Now if the there is some read with the N operator, the engine returns a user exception. The error message indicates what is the problem (including the offending read and mapping position) and give a couple of alternatives that the user can take in order to move forward:
a) ask for those reads to be filtered out (with --filter_reads_with_N_cigar or -filterRNC)
b) keep them in as before (with -U ALLOW_N_CIGAR_READS or -U ALL)
Notice that (b) does not have any effect if (a) is enacted; i.e. filtering overrides ignoring.
Implementation:
* Added filterReadsWithMCigar argument to MalformedReadFilter with the corresponding changes in the code to get it to work.
* Added ALLOW_N_CIGAR_READS unsafe flag so that N cigar containing reads can be processed as they are if that is what the user wants.
* Added ReadFilterTest class commont parent for ReadFilter test cases.
* Refactor ReadGroupBlackListFilterUnitTest to extend ReadFilterTest and push up some functionality to that class.
* Modified MalformedReadFilterUnitTest to extend ReadFilterTest and to test the new filter functionality.
* Added AllowNCigarMalformedReadFilterUnittest to check on the behavior when the unsafe ALLOW_N_CIGAR_READS flag is used.
* Added UnsafeNCigarMalformedReadFilterUnittest to check on the behavior when the unsafe ALL flag is used.
* Updated a broken test case in UnifiedGenotyperIntegrationTest resulting from the new behavior.
* Updated EngineFeaturesIntegrationTest testdata to be compliant with new behavior
- Memoized MathUtil's cumulative binomial probability function.
- Reduced the default size of the read name map in reduced reads and handle its resets more efficiently.
-- Created a new annotation DepthPerSampleHC that is by default on in the HaplotypeCaller
-- The depth for the HC is the sum of the informative alleles at this site. It's not perfect (as we cannot differentiate between reads that align over the event but aren't informative vs. those that aren't even close) but it's a pretty good proxy and it matches with the AD field (i.e., sum(AD) = DP).
-- Update MD5s
-- delivers [#48240601]
-- In the case where we have multiple potential alternative alleles *and* we weren't calling all of them (so that n potential values < n called) we could end up trimming the alleles down which would result in the mismatch between the PerReadAlleleLikelihoodMap alleles and the VariantContext trimmed alleles.
-- Fixed by doing two things (1) moving the trimming code after the annotation call and (2) updating AD annotation to check that the alleles in the VariantContext and the PerReadAlleleLikelihoodMap are concordant, which will stop us from degenerating in the future.
-- delivers [#50897077]
-- This occurred because we were reverting reads with soft clips that would produce reads with negative (or 0) alignment starts. From such reads we could end up with adaptor starts that were negative and that would ultimately produce the "Only one of refStart or refStop must be < 0, not both" error in the FragmentUtils merging code (which would revert and adaptor clip reads).
-- We now hard clip away bases soft clipped reverted bases that fall before the 1-based contig start in revertSoftClippedBases.
-- Replace buggy cigarFromString with proper SAM-JDK call TextCigarCodec.getSingleton().decode(cigarString)
-- Added unit tests for reverting soft clipped bases that create a read before the contig
-- [delivers #50892431]
-- Ultimately this was caused by overly aggressive merging of CommonSuffixMerger. In the case where you have this graph:
ACT [ref source] -> C
G -> ACT -> C
we would merge into
G -> ACT -> C
which would linearlize into
GACTC
Causing us to add bases to the reference source node that couldn't be recovered. The solution was to ensure that CommonSuffixMerger only operates when all nodes to be merged aren't source nodes themselves.
-- Added a convenient argument to the haplotype caller (captureAssemblyFailureBAM) that will write out the exact reads to a BAM file that went into a failed assembly run (going to a file called AssemblyFailure.BAM). This can be used to rerun the haplotype caller to produce the exact error, which can be hard in regions of deep coverage where the downsampler state determines the exact reads going into assembly and therefore makes running with a sub-interval not reproduce the error
-- Did some misc. cleanup of code while debugging
-- [delivers #50917729]
-- Ultimately this was caused by an underlying bug in the reverting of soft clipped bases in the read clipper. The read clipper would fail to properly set the alignment start for reads that were 100% clipped before reverting, such as 10H2S5H => 10H2M5H. This has been fixed and unit tested.
-- Update 1 ReduceReads MD5, which was due to cases where we were clipping away all of the MATCH part of the read, leaving a cigar like 50H11S and the revert soft clips was failing to properly revert the bases.
-- delivers #50655421
-- Although the original bug report was about SplitSamFile it actually was an engine wide error. The two places in the that provide compression to the BAM write now check the validity of the compress argument via a static method in ReadUtils
-- delivers #49531009
-- The previous implementation attempted to be robust to this, but not all cases were handled properly. Added a helper function updateInde() that bounds up the update to be in the range of the indel array, and cleaned up logic of how the method works. The previous behavior was inconsistent across read fwd/rev stand, so that the indel cigars at the end of read were put at the start of reads if the reads were in the forward strand but not if they were in the reverse strand. Everything is now consistent, as can be seen in the symmetry of the unit tests:
tests.add(new Object[]{"1D3M", false, EventType.BASE_DELETION, new int[]{0,0,0}});
tests.add(new Object[]{"1M1D2M", false, EventType.BASE_DELETION, new int[]{1,0,0}});
tests.add(new Object[]{"2M1D1M", false, EventType.BASE_DELETION, new int[]{0,1,0}});
tests.add(new Object[]{"3M1D", false, EventType.BASE_DELETION, new int[]{0,0,1}});
tests.add(new Object[]{"1D3M", true, EventType.BASE_DELETION, new int[]{1,0,0}});
tests.add(new Object[]{"1M1D2M", true, EventType.BASE_DELETION, new int[]{0,1,0}});
tests.add(new Object[]{"2M1D1M", true, EventType.BASE_DELETION, new int[]{0,0,1}});
tests.add(new Object[]{"3M1D", true, EventType.BASE_DELETION, new int[]{0,0,0}});
tests.add(new Object[]{"4M1I", false, EventType.BASE_INSERTION, new int[]{0,0,0,1,0}});
tests.add(new Object[]{"3M1I1M", false, EventType.BASE_INSERTION, new int[]{0,0,1,0,0}});
tests.add(new Object[]{"2M1I2M", false, EventType.BASE_INSERTION, new int[]{0,1,0,0,0}});
tests.add(new Object[]{"1M1I3M", false, EventType.BASE_INSERTION, new int[]{1,0,0,0,0}});
tests.add(new Object[]{"1I4M", false, EventType.BASE_INSERTION, new int[]{0,0,0,0,0}});
tests.add(new Object[]{"4M1I", true, EventType.BASE_INSERTION, new int[]{0,0,0,0,0}});
tests.add(new Object[]{"3M1I1M", true, EventType.BASE_INSERTION, new int[]{0,0,0,0,1}});
tests.add(new Object[]{"2M1I2M", true, EventType.BASE_INSERTION, new int[]{0,0,0,1,0}});
tests.add(new Object[]{"1M1I3M", true, EventType.BASE_INSERTION, new int[]{0,0,1,0,0}});
tests.add(new Object[]{"1I4M", true, EventType.BASE_INSERTION, new int[]{0,1,0,0,0}});
-- delivers #50445353
-This was accidentally clobbered in a recent commit.
-If you want to compile Java-only, easiest thing to
do is run "ant gatk" rather than modifying build.xml
-- We now inject the given alleles into the reference haplotype and add them to the graph.
-- Those paths are read off of the graph and then evaluated with the appropriate marginalization for GGA mode.
-- This unifies how Smith-Waterman is performed between discovery and GGA modes.
-- Misc minor cleanup in several places.
1) Add in checks for input parameters in MathUtils method. I was careful to use the bottom-level methods whenever possible, so that parameters don't needlessly go through multiple checks (so for instance, the parameters n and k for a binomial aren't checked on log10binomial, but rather in the log10binomialcoefficient subroutine).
This addresses JIRA GSA-767
Unit tests pass (we'll let bamboo deal with the integrations)
2) Address reviewer comments (change UserExceptions to IllegalArgumentExceptions).
3) .isWellFormedDouble() tests for infinity and not strictly positive infinity. Allow negative-infinity values for log10sumlog10 (as these just correspond to p=0).
After these commits, unit and integration tests now pass, and GSA-767 is done.
rebase and fix conflict:
public/java/src/org/broadinstitute/sting/utils/MathUtils.java
-- This allows us to use -rf ReassignMappingQuality to reassign mapping qualities to 60 *before* the BQSR filters them out with MappingQualityUnassignedFilter.
-- delivers #50222251
The problem ultimately was that ReadUtils.readStartsWithInsertion() ignores leading hard/softclips, but
ReduceReads does not. So I refactored that method to include a boolean argument as to whether or not
clips should be ignored. Also rebased so that return type is no longer a Pair.
Added unit test to cover this situation.
-ReadShardBalancer was printing out an extra "Loading BAM index data for next contig"
message at traversal end, which was confusing users and making the GATK look stupid.
Suppress the extraneous message, and reword the log messages to be less confusing.
-Improve log message output when initializing the shard iterator in GenomeAnalysisEngine.
Don't mention BAMs when the are none, and say "Preparing for traversal" rather than
mentioning the meaningless-for-users concept of "shard strategy"
-These log messages are needed because the operations they surround might take a
while under some circumstances, and the user should know that the GATK is actively
doing something rather than being hung.
Eric Banks
Ryan Poplin
Mark DePristo
Mauricio Carneiro
Valentin Ruano-Rubio
Michael McCowan
droazen
Chris Hartl