-- TraversalReadsNano only creates the NanoScheduler once, and shuts it down onTraversalDone
-- Nicer debugging output in NanoScheduler
-- ReadShard has a getBufferSize() method now
-- I'm seeing a lot of people trying to use BinaryTagCovariate in the community. They really shouldn't do this, so I moved it to private.
-- Throw an exception if its required bintag argument is missing
-- Check explicitly if user is requesting DinucCovariate and tell them that its been retired in favor of ContextCovariate
-- Show the type (Required, Experimental, Standard) of the covariates when running --list
A number of functions int he sampleDB looked to be assuming that samples could not share IDs (e.g. sample IDs are unique, so a sample present in two families could not be represented by multiple Sample objects). Added an assertion in the SampleDBBuilder to document/test this assumption.
MVLikelihoodRatio now uses the trio methods from SampleDB.
-- Groups inputs for each thread so that we don't have one thread execution per map() call
-- Added shutdown function
-- Documentation everywhere
-- Code cleanup
-- Extensive unittests
-- At this point I'm ready to integrate it into the engine for CPU parallel read walkers
– Write general NanoScheduler framework in utils.threading. Test with reading via iterator from list of integers, map is int * 2, reduce is sum. Should be efficiency using resources to do sum of 2 * (sum(1 - X)).
Done!
CPU parallelism is nano threads. Pfor across read / map / reduce. Use work queue to implement.
Create general read map reduce framework in utils. Test parallelism independently before hooking up to Locus iterator
Represent explicitly the dependency graph. Scheduler should choose the work units that are ready for computation, that are marked as "completing a computation", and then finally that maximize the number of sequent available work units. May be worth measuring expected cost for read read / map / reduce unit and use it to balance the compute
As input is single threaded just need one thread to populate inputs, which runs as fast as possible on parallel pushing data to fixed size queue. Each push creates map job and links to upcoming reduce job.
Note that there's at most one thread for IO tasks, and all of the threads can contribute to CPU tasks
-- GATKRunReports contain itemized information about the numThreads used to execute the GATK, as well as the efficiency of the use of those threads to get real work done, including time spent running, waiting, blocking, and waiting for IO
-- See https://jira.broadinstitute.org/browse/GSA-506 for more details
-- Invert logic in GATKArgumentCollection to disable monitoring, not enable. That means monitoring is on by default
-- Fix testing error in unit tests
-- Rename variables in ThreadAllocation to be clearer
-- Old version StateMonitoringThreadFactory refactored into base class ThreadEfficiencyMonitor and subclass EfficiencyMonitoringThreadFactory.
-- Base class is used by LinearMicroScheduler to monitor performance of GATK in single threaded mode
-- MicroScheduler now handles management of the efficiency monitor. Includes master thread in monitor, meaning that reduce is now included for both schedulers
-- Allows us to ID (by proxy) time spent doing IO
-- Refactor StateMonitoryingThreadFactory to use it's own enum, not Thread.State
-- Reliable unit tests across mac and unix
-- See https://jira.broadinstitute.org/browse/GSA-502
-- New command line argument -mt enables thread monitoring
-- If enabled, HMS uses StateMonitoringThreadFactory to create monitored threads, and prints out an efficiency report when HMS exits, telling the user information like:
for BQSR – known to be inefficient locking
INFO 17:10:33,195 StateMonitoringThreadFactory - Number of activeThreads used: 8
INFO 17:10:33,196 StateMonitoringThreadFactory - Total runtime 90.3 m
INFO 17:10:33,196 StateMonitoringThreadFactory - Fraction of time spent blocked is 0.72 ( 64.8 m)
INFO 17:10:33,197 StateMonitoringThreadFactory - Fraction of time spent running is 0.26 ( 23.7 m)
INFO 17:10:33,197 StateMonitoringThreadFactory - Fraction of time spent waiting is 0.02 ( 112.8 s)
INFO 17:10:33,197 StateMonitoringThreadFactory - Efficiency of multi-threading: 26.19% of time spent doing productive work
for CountLoci
INFO 17:06:12,777 StateMonitoringThreadFactory - Number of activeThreads used: 8
INFO 17:06:12,777 StateMonitoringThreadFactory - Total runtime 43.5 m
INFO 17:06:12,778 StateMonitoringThreadFactory - Fraction of time spent blocked is 0.00 ( 4.2 s)
INFO 17:06:12,778 StateMonitoringThreadFactory - Fraction of time spent running is 1.00 ( 43.3 m)
INFO 17:06:12,779 StateMonitoringThreadFactory - Fraction of time spent waiting is 0.00 ( 6.0 s)
INFO 17:06:12,779 StateMonitoringThreadFactory - Efficiency of multi-threading: 99.61% of time spent doing productive work
-- For the high NT tests the total runtime may be too short to really assess nt efficiency vs. start up costs. Reworked underlying test data and intervals so that most tests run in 10-20 hrs for -nt 1.
Eric Banks
Mark DePristo
Khalid Shakir
Christopher Hartl