Commit Graph

9 Commits (701d70401f406c1a9c63a0b2e91c837ce095c871)

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Roazen 95b5f99feb Exclude reduced reads from elimination during downsampling
Problem:
-Downsamplers were treating reduced reads the same as normal reads,
 with occasionally catastrophic results on variant calling when an
 entire reduced read happened to get eliminated.

Solution:
-Since reduced reads lack the information we need to do position-based
 downsampling on them, best available option for now is to simply
 exempt all reduced reads from elimination during downsampling.

Details:
-Add generic capability of exempting items from elimination to
 the Downsampler interface via new doNotDiscardItem() method.
 Default inherited version of this method exempts all reduced reads
 (or objects encapsulating reduced reads) from elimination.

-Switch from interfaces to abstract classes to facilitate this change,
 and do some minor refactoring of the Downsampler interface (push
 implementation of some methods into the abstract classes, improve
 names of the confusing clear() and reset() methods).

-Rewrite TAROrderedReadCache. This class was incorrectly relying
 on the ReservoirDownsampler to preserve the relative ordering of
 items in some circumstances, which was behavior not guaranteed by
 the API and only happened to work due to implementation details
 which no longer apply. Restructured this class around the assumption
 that the ReservoirDownsampler will not preserve relative ordering
 at all.

-Add disclaimer to description of -dcov argument explaining that
 coverage targets are approximate goals that will not always be
 precisely met.

-Unit tests for all individual downsamplers to verify that reduced
 reads are exempted from elimination
2013-06-11 16:16:26 -04:00
David Roazen a7cb599945 Require a minimum dcov value of 200 for Locus and ActiveRegion walkers when downsampling to coverage
-Throw a UserException if a Locus or ActiveRegion walker is run with -dcov < 200,
 since low dcov values can result in problematic downsampling artifacts for locus-based
 traversals.

-Read-based traversals continue to have no minimum for -dcov, since dcov for read traversals
 controls the number of reads per alignment start position, and even a dcov value of 1 might
 be safe/desirable in some circumstances.

-Also reorganize the global downsampling defaults so that they are specified as annotations
 to the Walker, LocusWalker, and ActiveRegionWalker classes rather than as constants in the
 DownsamplingMethod class.

-The default downsampling settings have not been changed: they are still -dcov 1000
 for Locus and ActiveRegion walkers, and -dt NONE for all other walkers.
2013-05-29 12:07:12 -04:00
Eric Banks 58424e56be Setting the reduce reads count tag was all wrong in a previous commit; fixing.
RR counts are represented as offsets from the first count, but that wasn't being done
correctly when counts are adjusted on the fly.  Also, we were triggering the expensive
conversion and writing to binary tags even when we weren't going to write the read
to disk.

The code has been updated so that unconverted counts are passed to the GATKSAMRecord
and it knows how to encode the tag correctly.  Also, there are now methods to write
to the reduced counts array without forcing the conversion (and methods that do force
the conversion).

Also:
1. counts are now maintained as ints whenever possible.  Only the GATKSAMRecord knows
about the internal encoding.
2. as discussed in meetings today, we updated the encoding so that it can now handle
a range of values that extends to 255 instead of 127 (and is backwards compatible).
3. tests have been moved from SyntheticReadUnitTest to GATKSAMRecordUnitTest accordingly.
2013-04-30 13:45:42 -04:00
Eric Banks ba2c3b57ed Extended the allele-biased down-sampling functionality to handle reduced reads.
Note that this works only in the case of pileups (i.e. coming from UG);
allele-biased down-sampling for RR just cannot work for haplotypes.

Added lots of unit tests for new functionality.
2013-04-26 11:23:17 -04:00
Mark DePristo 317dc4c323 Add size() method to Downsampler interface
-- This method provides client with the current number of elements, without having to retreive the underlying list<T>.  Added unit tests for LevelingDownsampler and ReservoirDownsampler as these are the only two complex ones.  All of the others are trivially obviously correct.
2013-04-08 15:48:13 -04:00
Yossi Farjoun baad965a57 - Changed loadContaminationFile file parser to delimit by tab only. This allows spaces in sampleIDs, which apparently are allowed.
- This was needed since samples with spaces in their names are regularly found in the picard pipeline.
- Modified the tests to account for this (removed spaces from the good tests, and changed the failing tests accordingly)
- Cleaned up the unit tests using a @DataProvider (I'm in love...).
- Moved AlleleBiasedDownsamplingUtilsUnitTest to public to match location of class it is testing (due to the way bamboo operates)
2013-03-07 13:04:24 -05:00
Mauricio Carneiro 2a4ccfe6fd Updated all JAVA file licenses accordingly
GSATDG-5
2013-01-10 17:06:41 -05:00
David Roazen cb84a6473f Downsampling: experimental engine integration
-Off by default; engine fork isolates new code paths from old code paths,
so no integration tests change yet

-Experimental implementation is currently BROKEN due to a serious issue
involving file spans. No one can/should use the experimental features
until I've patched this issue.

-There are temporarily two independent versions of LocusIteratorByState.
Anyone changing one version should port the change to the other (if possible),
and anyone adding unit tests for one version should add the same unit tests
for the other (again, if possible). This situation will hopefully be extremely
temporary, and last only until the experimental implementation is proven.
2012-09-06 15:03:27 -04:00
David Roazen 0550b27799 Make downsampler classes themselves generic (instead of just the Downsampler interface)
This is in response to a request from Mauricio to make it easier
to use the downsamplers with GATKSAMRecords (as opposed to SAMRecords)
without having to do any cumbersome typecasting. Sadly, Java
language limitations make this sort of solution the best choice.

Thanks to Khalid for his feedback on this issue.

Also:

-added a unit test to verify GATKSAMRecord support with no typecasting required

-added some unit tests for the FractionalDownsampler that Mauricio will/might be using

-moved classes from private to public to better sync up with my local development
branch for engine integration
2012-06-13 16:43:39 -04:00