* new unit tests for the alignment shift properties of reduce reads
* moved unit tests from ReadUtils that were actually testing GATKSAMRecord, not any of the ReadUtils to it.
* cleaned up ReadUtilsUnitTest
* Added annotations for reads that had been soft clipped prior to being reduced so that we can later recuperate their original alignments (start and end).
* Tags keep the alignment shifts, not real alignment, for better compression
* Tags are defined in the GATKSAMRecord
* GATKSAMRecord has new functionality to retrieve original alignment start of all reads (trimmed or not) -- getOriginalAlignmentStart() and getOriginalAligmentEnd()
* Updated ReduceReads MD5s accordingly
Eric reported this bug due to the reduced reads failing with an index out of bounds on what we thought was a deletion, but turned out to be a read starting with insertion.
* Refactored PileupElement to distinguish clearly between deletions and read starting with insertion
* Modified ExtendedEventPileup to correctly distinguish elements with deletion when creating new pileups
* Refactored most of the lazyLoadNextAlignment() function of the LocusIteratorByState for clarity and to create clear separation between what is a pileup with a deletion and what's not one. Got rid of many useless if statements.
* Changed the way LocusIteratorByState creates extended event pileups to differentiate between insertions in the beginning of the read and deletions.
* Every deletion now has an offset (start of the event)
* Fixed bug when LocusITeratorByState found a read starting with insertion that happened to be a reduced read.
* Separated the definitions of deletion/insertion (in the beginning of the read) in all UG annotations (and the annotator engine).
* Pileup depth of coverage for a deleted base will now return the average coverage around the deletion.
* Indel ReadPositionRankSum test now uses the deletion true offset from the read, changed all appropriate md5's
* The extra pileup elements now properly read by the Indel mode of the UG made any subsequent call have a different random number and therefore all RankSum tests have slightly different values (in the 10^-3 range). Updated all appropriate md5s after extremely careful inspection -- Thanks Ryan!
phew!
reporting malformed BAMs was actually misreporting any error that happened in the Picard layer
as a BAM ERROR.
Specifically changing PicardException to report as a ReviewedStingException; we might want to
change it in the future. I'll followup with the Picard team to make sure they really, really
want PicardException to inherit from SAMException.
-- Disturbingly, fixing this bug doesn't actually cause an test failures.
-- Wrote a new QCRefWalker to actually check in detail that the reference bases coming into the RefWalker are all correct when comparing against a clean uncached load of the contig bases directly.
-- However, I cannot run this tool due to some kind of weird BAM error -- sending this on to Matt
-- Missing BAMs were appearing as StingExceptions
-- Missing VCFs were showing up as CommandLineErrors, but it's clearer for them to be CouldNotReadInputFile exceptions
-- Added integration tests to ensure missing BAMs, VCFs, and -L files are properly thrown as CouldNotReadInputFile exceptions
-- Added path to standard b37 BAM to BaseTest
-- Cleaned up code in SAMDataSource, removing my parallel loading code as this just didn't prove to be useful.
This is somewhat of an arbitrary decision, and is negotiable. I could see treating
GT:PL ./.:.
differently from
GT:PL .:0,3,6
but am not sure the worth of doing so.
-- Instead issue a warning when a large (>1MB) record is encountered
-- Optimized ref.getBytes()[i] => (byte)ref.charAt(i), which avoids an implicit O(n) allocation each iteration through computeReverseClipping()
Mauricio Carneiro
Eric Banks
Ryan Poplin
Menachem Fromer
Matt Hanna
Mark DePristo
Khalid Shakir
Christopher Hartl
Guillermo del Angel