From 6d5b643a9d89a5274baab4359596b38b81dfbede Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Geraldine Van der Auwera Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 08:42:49 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Fix tagging syntax Syntax was given as -V:format,name but should be -V:name,format --- .../gatk/tools/walkers/variantutils/CombineVariants.java | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/public/gatk-tools-public/src/main/java/org/broadinstitute/gatk/tools/walkers/variantutils/CombineVariants.java b/public/gatk-tools-public/src/main/java/org/broadinstitute/gatk/tools/walkers/variantutils/CombineVariants.java index f89509603..8a11da65a 100644 --- a/public/gatk-tools-public/src/main/java/org/broadinstitute/gatk/tools/walkers/variantutils/CombineVariants.java +++ b/public/gatk-tools-public/src/main/java/org/broadinstitute/gatk/tools/walkers/variantutils/CombineVariants.java @@ -72,9 +72,9 @@ import java.util.*; * * *

By default, the input sets will be named variants, variants2, variants3, and so on. You can override this by - * providing an explicit name tag for each input, using the syntax " -V:format,name". Each input tagged in this + * providing an explicit name tag for each input, using the syntax " -V:name,format". Each input tagged in this * way will be labeled as such in the output (i.e., set=name rather than set=variants2). For example, you could specify - * a set of control samples as " -V:vcf,control my_control_samples.vcf", and the resulting VCF records would contain + * a set of control samples as " -V:control,vcf my_control_samples.vcf", and the resulting VCF records would contain * the annotation "set=control" in the INFO field. It is strongly recommended to provide explicit names in this way * when a rod priority list is provided.

* @@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ import java.util.*; * *

Caveats

* * *

Additional notes