remove public-protected dependency by commeting out some code that should be re-included after all the walkers will be in portected (added some todos)
This commit is contained in:
parent
8bbb9e1cc2
commit
673ed0aaa6
|
|
@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ import org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.MathUtils;
|
|||
import org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.clipping.ReadClipper;
|
||||
import org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.exceptions.UserException;
|
||||
import org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.pairhmm.ExactPairHMM;
|
||||
import org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.pairhmm.LoglessCachingPairHMM;
|
||||
//import org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.pairhmm.LoglessCachingPairHMM;
|
||||
import org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.pairhmm.OriginalPairHMM;
|
||||
import org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.pairhmm.PairHMM;
|
||||
import org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.pileup.PileupElement;
|
||||
|
|
@ -102,9 +102,9 @@ public class PairHMMIndelErrorModel {
|
|||
break;
|
||||
case CACHING:
|
||||
case LOGLESS_CACHING: //TODO: still not tested so please do not use yet
|
||||
pairHMM = new LoglessCachingPairHMM();
|
||||
System.err.println("warning: this option (LOGLESS_CACHING in UG) is still under development");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
//pairHMM = new LoglessCachingPairHMM(); //TODO - add it back when the figure out how to use the protected LoglessCachingPairHMM class
|
||||
throw new UserException.BadArgumentValue("pairHMM"," this option (LOGLESS_CACHING in UG) is still under development");
|
||||
//break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
throw new UserException.BadArgumentValue("pairHMM", "Specified pairHMM implementation is unrecognized or incompatible with the UnifiedGenotyper. Acceptable options are ORIGINAL, EXACT or LOGLESS_CACHING (the third option is still under development).");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue