remove public-protected dependency by commeting out some code that should be re-included after all the walkers will be in portected (added some todos)

This commit is contained in:
Ami Levy-Moonshine 2013-01-07 17:07:23 -05:00
parent 8bbb9e1cc2
commit 673ed0aaa6
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ import org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.MathUtils;
import org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.clipping.ReadClipper;
import org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.exceptions.UserException;
import org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.pairhmm.ExactPairHMM;
import org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.pairhmm.LoglessCachingPairHMM;
//import org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.pairhmm.LoglessCachingPairHMM;
import org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.pairhmm.OriginalPairHMM;
import org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.pairhmm.PairHMM;
import org.broadinstitute.sting.utils.pileup.PileupElement;
@ -102,9 +102,9 @@ public class PairHMMIndelErrorModel {
break;
case CACHING:
case LOGLESS_CACHING: //TODO: still not tested so please do not use yet
pairHMM = new LoglessCachingPairHMM();
System.err.println("warning: this option (LOGLESS_CACHING in UG) is still under development");
break;
//pairHMM = new LoglessCachingPairHMM(); //TODO - add it back when the figure out how to use the protected LoglessCachingPairHMM class
throw new UserException.BadArgumentValue("pairHMM"," this option (LOGLESS_CACHING in UG) is still under development");
//break;
default:
throw new UserException.BadArgumentValue("pairHMM", "Specified pairHMM implementation is unrecognized or incompatible with the UnifiedGenotyper. Acceptable options are ORIGINAL, EXACT or LOGLESS_CACHING (the third option is still under development).");
}