Minor clarifications & formatting tweaks for dcov docs
This commit is contained in:
parent
a9fa5206ee
commit
66d0235efc
|
|
@ -119,21 +119,29 @@ public class GATKArgumentCollection {
|
|||
// Downsampling Arguments
|
||||
//
|
||||
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
@Argument(fullName = "downsampling_type", shortName="dt", doc="Type of reads downsampling to employ at a given locus. Reads will be selected randomly to be removed from the pile based on the method described here", required = false)
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Reads will be selected randomly to be removed from the pile based on the method described here.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Argument(fullName = "downsampling_type", shortName="dt", doc="Type of reads downsampling to employ at a given locus", required = false)
|
||||
public DownsampleType downsamplingType = null;
|
||||
|
||||
@Argument(fullName = "downsample_to_fraction", shortName = "dfrac", doc = "Fraction [0.0-1.0] of reads to downsample to", required = false)
|
||||
public Double downsampleFraction = null;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* For locus-based traversals (eg., LocusWalkers and ActiveRegionWalkers), downsample_to_coverage controls the
|
||||
* maximum depth of coverage at each locus. For non-locus-based traversals (eg., ReadWalkers), this controls the
|
||||
* maximum number of reads sharing the same alignment start position. Note that for ReadWalkers, since -dcov controls
|
||||
* the maximum number of reads sharing the same alignment start position, you will typically need to use much lower
|
||||
* dcov values than you would with LocusWalkers to see an effect. Note also that this downsampling option does NOT
|
||||
* produce an unbiased random sampling from all available reads at each locus: instead, the primary goal of the
|
||||
* to-coverage downsampler is to maintain an even representation of reads from all alignment start positions when
|
||||
* removing excess coverage. For a true across-the-board unbiased random sampling of reads, use -dfrac instead. Also
|
||||
* note that the coverage target is an approximate goal that is not guaranteed to be met exactly: the downsampling
|
||||
* algorithm will under some circumstances retain slightly more coverage than requested.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Argument(fullName = "downsample_to_coverage", shortName = "dcov",
|
||||
doc = "Coverage [integer] to downsample to. For locus-based traversals (eg., LocusWalkers and ActiveRegionWalkers)," +
|
||||
"this controls the maximum depth of coverage at each locus. For non-locus-based traversals (eg., ReadWalkers), " +
|
||||
"this controls the maximum number of reads sharing the same alignment start position. Note that this downsampling " +
|
||||
"option does NOT produce an unbiased random sampling from all available reads at each locus: instead, the primary goal of " +
|
||||
"the to-coverage downsampler is to maintain an even representation of reads from all alignment start positions " +
|
||||
"when removing excess coverage. For a true across-the-board unbiased random sampling of reads, use -dfrac instead. " +
|
||||
"Also note that the coverage target is an approximate goal that is not guaranteed to be met exactly: the downsampling " +
|
||||
"algorithm will under some circumstances retain slightly more coverage than requested.",
|
||||
doc = "Coverage [integer] to downsample to",
|
||||
required = false)
|
||||
public Integer downsampleCoverage = null;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue