It's clear from Sendu's calling and my own calling that -qScale 100.0 is a much better default value for low pass data.
git-svn-id: file:///humgen/gsa-scr1/gsa-engineering/svn_contents/trunk@4248 348d0f76-0448-11de-a6fe-93d51630548a
This commit is contained in:
parent
e183b6598c
commit
61e848c4f0
|
|
@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ public class VariantRecalibrator extends RodWalker<ExpandingArrayList<VariantDat
|
|||
@Argument(fullName="singleton_fp_rate", shortName="fp_rate", doc="Prior expectation that a singleton call would be a FP", required=false)
|
||||
private double SINGLETON_FP_RATE = 0.5;
|
||||
@Argument(fullName="quality_scale_factor", shortName="qScale", doc="Multiply all final quality scores by this value. Needed to normalize the quality scores.", required=false)
|
||||
private double QUALITY_SCALE_FACTOR = 20.0;
|
||||
private double QUALITY_SCALE_FACTOR = 100.0;
|
||||
|
||||
/////////////////////////////
|
||||
// Private Member Variables
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ public class VariantRecalibrationWalkersIntegrationTest extends WalkerTest {
|
|||
" --ignore_filter HARD_TO_VALIDATE" +
|
||||
" -clusterFile " + clusterFile +
|
||||
" -titv 2.07" +
|
||||
" -qScale 20.0" +
|
||||
" -o %s" +
|
||||
" -tranchesFile %s" +
|
||||
" -reportDatFile %s",
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue