BaseCoverageDistributions should be 'by reference'
otherwise we miss all the 0 coverage spots.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e02dac03aa
commit
3d9a83c759
|
|
@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ import org.broadinstitute.sting.gatk.contexts.AlignmentContext;
|
|||
import org.broadinstitute.sting.gatk.contexts.ReferenceContext;
|
||||
import org.broadinstitute.sting.gatk.refdata.RefMetaDataTracker;
|
||||
import org.broadinstitute.sting.gatk.report.GATKReport;
|
||||
import org.broadinstitute.sting.gatk.walkers.By;
|
||||
import org.broadinstitute.sting.gatk.walkers.DataSource;
|
||||
import org.broadinstitute.sting.gatk.walkers.LocusWalker;
|
||||
|
||||
import java.io.PrintStream;
|
||||
|
|
@ -62,6 +64,7 @@ import java.util.Map;
|
|||
* Date: 1/27/13
|
||||
* Time: 11:16 AM
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@By(DataSource.REFERENCE)
|
||||
public class BaseCoverageDistribution extends LocusWalker<Integer, Map<Integer, Long>> {
|
||||
@Output(required = true)
|
||||
private PrintStream out;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue