more FAQs on ALT mapping
This commit is contained in:
parent
d6e8e5929b
commit
393735d7f1
17
README.md
17
README.md
|
|
@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ do not have plan to submit it to a peer-reviewed journal in the near future.
|
|||
4. [Why can one read in a pair has high mapping quality but the other has zero?](#pe0)
|
||||
5. [How can a BWA-backtrack alignment stands out of the end of a chromosome?](#endref)
|
||||
6. [Does BWA work with ALT contigs in the GRCh38 release?](#altctg)
|
||||
7. [Can I just run BWA-MEM against GRCh38+ALT without post-processing?](#postalt)
|
||||
|
||||
####<a name="type"></a>1. What types of data does BWA work with?
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -136,7 +137,21 @@ as well. BWA-MEM does not have this problem.
|
|||
|
||||
####<a name="altctg"></a>6. Does BWA work with ALT contigs in the GRCh38 release?
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, since 0.7.11. Please see [README-alt.md][18] for details.
|
||||
Yes, since 0.7.11, BWA-MEM officially supports mapping to GRCh38+ALT.
|
||||
BWA-backtrack and BWA-SW don't properly support ALT mapping as of now. Please
|
||||
see [README-alt.md][18] for details. Briefly, it is recommended to use
|
||||
[bwakit][17], the binary release of BWA, for generating the reference genome
|
||||
and for mapping.
|
||||
|
||||
####<a name="postalt"></a>7. Can I just run BWA-MEM against GRCh38+ALT without post-processing?
|
||||
|
||||
If you are not interested in hits to ALT contigs, it is okay to run BWA-MEM
|
||||
without post-processing. The alignments produced this way are very close to
|
||||
alignments against GRCh38 without ALT contigs. Nonetheless, applying
|
||||
post-processing helps to reduce false mappings caused by reads from the
|
||||
diverged part of ALT contigs and also enables HLA typing. It is recommended to
|
||||
run the post-processing script.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue