more FAQs on ALT mapping

This commit is contained in:
Heng Li 2014-12-02 10:30:35 -05:00
parent d6e8e5929b
commit 393735d7f1
1 changed files with 16 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ do not have plan to submit it to a peer-reviewed journal in the near future.
4. [Why can one read in a pair has high mapping quality but the other has zero?](#pe0)
5. [How can a BWA-backtrack alignment stands out of the end of a chromosome?](#endref)
6. [Does BWA work with ALT contigs in the GRCh38 release?](#altctg)
7. [Can I just run BWA-MEM against GRCh38+ALT without post-processing?](#postalt)
####<a name="type"></a>1. What types of data does BWA work with?
@ -136,7 +137,21 @@ as well. BWA-MEM does not have this problem.
####<a name="altctg"></a>6. Does BWA work with ALT contigs in the GRCh38 release?
Yes, since 0.7.11. Please see [README-alt.md][18] for details.
Yes, since 0.7.11, BWA-MEM officially supports mapping to GRCh38+ALT.
BWA-backtrack and BWA-SW don't properly support ALT mapping as of now. Please
see [README-alt.md][18] for details. Briefly, it is recommended to use
[bwakit][17], the binary release of BWA, for generating the reference genome
and for mapping.
####<a name="postalt"></a>7. Can I just run BWA-MEM against GRCh38+ALT without post-processing?
If you are not interested in hits to ALT contigs, it is okay to run BWA-MEM
without post-processing. The alignments produced this way are very close to
alignments against GRCh38 without ALT contigs. Nonetheless, applying
post-processing helps to reduce false mappings caused by reads from the
diverged part of ALT contigs and also enables HLA typing. It is recommended to
run the post-processing script.
[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License